type
status
date
slug
summary
category
tags
icon
password
In this age of information overload, we are surrounded by various opinions and assertions every day. Whether in news reports, social media, or daily conversations, logical fallacies often subtly infiltrate, affecting our thinking and judgment. They not only can lead us into ineffective arguments during discussions but may also cause us to make incorrect decisions. Mastering the ability to identify these mental traps not only allows us to maintain a clear mind when facing complex issues but also helps us make more rational and wise choices.
This article aims to introduce several common logical fallacies and provide rich extended learning resources to help you improve your logical and critical thinking skills. When facing the complex world, having this thinking tool can allow you to stand at a higher perspective, clearly distinguishing truth from fallacy.
Traps Are Everywhere
Let's do a little logic test. How many fallacies can you identify in the following arguments?
"Japan is a developed country, they surely wouldn't do anything to harm the globe."
This is a discussion about Japan's nuclear wastewater discharge. What error was made? This is using the appeal to authority fallacy, assuming that a country's technological advancement necessarily means its decisions are correct, while ignoring specific scientific evidence.
"My grandfather took Chinese medicine for decades and lived to be over ninety, so Traditional Chinese Medicine must be effective."
This is a typical hasty generalization fallacy, drawing a general conclusion based on individual cases while ignoring broader scientific research and the health conditions of others.
"All Palestinians are terrorists, there's no reasoning with them."
This is a discussion about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It commits the error of false dilemma, simplifying complex historical and political situations into two extremes while ignoring the possibilities in between.
"Experts used to talk about 'global cooling,' now they're saying 'global warming.' These experts are really unreliable."
This is a common view in discussions about climate change. It's a straw man fallacy, deliberately distorting scientists' arguments to attack them, rather than basing on actual scientific evidence.
"My friend had a fever for several days after getting the COVID-19 vaccine, these vaccines must be problematic."
This is a discussion about vaccine side effects, committing a hasty generalization fallacy, as individual negative examples are exaggerated to deny the overall effectiveness of vaccines.
"Electric cars are so much more expensive than gasoline cars, they're not worth buying at all."
This is a common view in discussions about new energy vehicles, committing a false dilemma fallacy. It simplifies complex economic and environmental issues into "either save money or waste money," ignoring the long-term benefits and environmental value of new energy vehicles.
These examples from daily conversations demonstrate the prevalence of logical fallacies. Identifying and avoiding these mental traps can help us maintain a clear mind when facing complex issues.
Common Logical Fallacies
Below are some common logical fallacies, organized by category, with detailed explanations and examples.
1. Formal Fallacies
Formal fallacies refer to errors in the reasoning structure itself. Even if the premises are correct, the conclusion cannot be established. These fallacies rely on the invalidity of the reasoning form.
1.1 Affirming the Consequent
- Explanation: Believing that if the conclusion is true, the premise must also be true. In reality, the establishment of the conclusion cannot reversely deduce the establishment of the premise.
- Example: If it rains, the ground is wet. The ground is wet, therefore it rained. (Ignoring other possible causes of wet ground)
1.2 Denying the Antecedent
- Explanation: Erroneously believing that if the premise doesn't hold, the conclusion also doesn't hold. In reality, the negation of the premise doesn't necessarily lead to the negation of the conclusion.
- Example: If it rains, the ground is wet. It didn't rain, therefore the ground isn't wet. (Ignoring other possible causes of wet ground)
2. Informal Fallacies
Informal fallacies involve errors in the content of reasoning, usually related to the pragmatics, language, or emotions of the argument.
2.1 Fallacies of Language
2.1.1 Equivocation
- Explanation: Using multiple meanings of a word in the argumentation process to mislead the audience.
- Example: Humans are rational animals. Pigs are not human, therefore pigs are not rational animals. (Switching the meaning of "human")
2.2 Fallacies of Relevance
2.2.1 Ad Hominem
- Explanation: Refuting the opponent's argument by attacking their personal characteristics, rather than discussing the argument itself.
- Example: You don't understand economics at all, so your opinion is invalid.
2.2.2 Appeal to Authority
- Explanation: Believing that an authority figure's opinion must be correct, without examining the argument itself.
- Example: A famous professor said this theory is correct, so we should believe it.
2.2.3 Appeal to Emotion
- Explanation: Influencing judgment by arousing emotions (such as fear, pity, etc.) rather than based on rational reasoning.
- Example: If you don't support this policy, many innocent children will suffer because of it.
2.2.4 Straw Man
- Explanation: Distorting the opponent's view, attacking this false view rather than the opponent's actual argument.
- Example: You say we should reduce military spending, so you don't care about national security.
2.3 Causal Fallacies
2.3.1 Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
- Explanation: Believing that because event B occurred after event A, A must have caused B.
- Example: I wore my lucky shirt and then passed the exam, so the shirt brought me good luck.
2.4 Fallacies of Assumption
2.4.1 Slippery Slope
- Explanation: Assuming that a small event will inevitably lead to a chain of negative consequences, without reasonable evidence.
- Example: If we allow students to bring phones to class, the next step is they'll demand to play games, and eventually the entire education system will collapse.
2.4.2 False Dilemma
- Explanation: Simplifying complex issues into two extreme options, ignoring other possibilities.
- Example: Either you're with us, or you're our enemy.
2.5 Fallacies of Insufficient Evidence
2.5.1 Hasty Generalization
- Explanation: Drawing general conclusions based on a small, unrepresentative sample.
- Example: The two French people I met were unfriendly, therefore all French people are unfriendly.
Extended Learning Resources
To understand logical fallacies and their underlying reasoning logic more deeply, here are some recommended learning resources.
1. Web Resources
1.1 Wikipedia - Logic
- Link: Logic - Wikipedia
- Introduction: The "Logic" entry on Wikipedia provides an overview of logic, including formal logic, informal logic, logical fallacies, etc. Suitable for beginners to quickly understand the basic framework of logic.
1.2 YourLogicalFallacyIs
- Link: YourLogicalFallacyIs
- Introduction: This is a website dedicated to introducing logical fallacies, providing easy-to-understand diagrams and explanations to help you identify and avoid common logical errors. The website also has a Chinese version.
1.3 Critical Thinking Web
- Link: Critical Thinking Web
- Introduction: A critical thinking resource website provided by the University of Hong Kong, covering logical reasoning, deductive and inductive reasoning, logical fallacies, etc. Suitable for in-depth study of logic and its applications.
2. Book Recommendations
2.1 "Introduction to Logic"
- Authors: Irving M. Copi, Carl Cohen
- Introduction: A classic logic textbook covering formal logic, informal logic, reasoning rules, and logical fallacies, suitable for readers with some foundation.
2.2 "What is Logic"
- Author: He Huaihong
- Introduction: An easy-to-understand introductory book on logic, suitable for beginners interested in logical thinking.
2.3 "Critical Thinking"
- Author: Diane Halpern
- Introduction: This book not only discusses logical reasoning but also covers how to apply critical thinking in daily life, helping readers identify fallacies and improve thinking skills.
3. Online Courses
3.1 Coursera - Introduction to Logic
- Provider: Stanford University
- Link: Introduction to Logic
- Introduction: This course covers the basics of formal logic, including propositional logic and predicate logic, suitable for beginners interested in logical reasoning.
3.2 edX - Critical Thinking Skills for University Success
- Provider: University of Sydney
- Introduction: This course focuses on the application of critical thinking in academics, covering logical reasoning and fallacy identification, suitable for learners looking to improve their critical thinking skills.
3.3 Khan Academy - Logic
- Provider: Khan Academy
- Link: Khan Academy Logic
- Introduction: Khan Academy offers free courses related to logical reasoning, suitable for beginners to quickly get started.
*Welcome to share and discuss! If you have any insights or questions about logical fallacies, feel free to leave a comment in the comment section. Let's explore together!
- Author:Zhenye Dong
- URL:https://dongzhenye.com/article/common-logical-fallacies-and-learning-resources
- Copyright:All articles in this blog, except for special statements, adopt BY-NC-SA agreement. Please indicate the source!